참조로 돌아가기
앱 가이드 및 팁
가장 인기 있는
Guru와 함께 모든 곳에서 정답을 얻으십시오.
데모 보기
July 13, 2025
XX 분 읽기

Re:amaze vs Jira Service Management

Introduction

When it comes to managing customer inquiries and internal services efficiently, businesses often turn to ticketing tools. Two popular options in this category are Re:amaze and Jira Service Management. 

Re:amaze is a comprehensive helpdesk and customer messaging platform. It supports various communication channels, including live chat, email, social media, mobile SMS/MMS, VOIP, and FAQ Knowledge Bases, making it ideal for websites, stores, and apps that need to provide exceptional customer support.

On the other hand, Jira Service Management is designed to empower Development (Dev) and Operations (Ops) teams to collaborate at high velocity. It enables these teams to respond to business changes and deliver outstanding services to both customers and employees quickly.

Choosing the right ticketing tool is crucial for businesses to ensure efficient communication, timely support, and seamless operations. A detailed comparison between Re:amaze and Jira Service Management can help you determine which tool best fits your specific needs.

Re:amaze Overview

Re:amaze brings a versatile customer support platform geared towards enhancing customer engagement across multiple channels.

Key Features

  • Multi-Channel Support: Re:amaze lets you communicate with customers via live chat, email, social media, mobile SMS/MMS, VOIP, and FAQ Knowledge Bases.
  • Unified Inbox: This feature aggregates messages from various channels into a single, organized inbox, ensuring no customer query is overlooked.
  • Automations: Re:amaze supports workflow automations to streamline repetitive tasks, respond to common questions automatically, and route inquiries to the appropriate team members.
  • CRM Integration: It integrates seamlessly with popular CRM systems like Shopify, Magento, WordPress, and others to offer deeper customer insights.
  • Customizable Chatbots: Re:amaze's AI-powered chatbots can handle routine inquiries, allowing your support team to focus on more complex issues.
  • Analytics and Reporting: The platform provides detailed analytics and reporting tools to help you better understand customer interactions and team performance.
  • Collaboration Tools: Features like private notes and team collaboration tools make it easy for support agents to work together on resolving customer issues.

Jira Service Management Overview

Jira Service Management is designed to bridge the gap between Dev and Ops teams, ensuring they work cohesively to deliver high-quality services.

총장고세요

Key Features

  • Incident Management: It allows teams to efficiently track, respond to, and resolve incidents, minimizing downtime and ensuring service reliability.
  • Change Management: The tool offers streamlined change management workflows that align with ITIL best practices, helping you manage changes while minimizing risk.
  • Service Request Management: Jira Service Management enables you to manage service requests from employees and customers effectively, ensuring timely approvals and fulfillment.
  • Asset and Configuration Management: The platform helps teams track IT assets and configuration items to understand relationships and dependencies within the services they manage.
  • Knowledge Base: Integration with Confluence allows for easy creation and sharing of knowledge articles, providing users and support agents with self-service options.
  • Customizable Queues and SLAs: It offers customizable queues and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to prioritize and manage tasks based on urgency and importance.
  • Automation: The tool includes automation rules to reduce manual workload, improve response times, and maintain service quality.
  • Integration Ecosystem: A broad integration ecosystem with other Atlassian tools (like Jira Software, Confluence) and third-party applications ensures a seamless workflow.

Similarities

Both Re:amaze and Jira Service Management are powerful ticketing tools designed to streamline support operations and improve customer and employee service experiences. They share several similarities:

  • Multi-Channel Support: Both provide robust multi-channel communication solutions to manage inquiries and requests.
  • Automation Capabilities: Both platforms offer automation features to reduce manual tasks and auto-assign tickets, improving overall efficiency.
  • Customizable Workflows: Each tool allows for customizable workflows and templates, ensuring they can be tailored to fit specific business needs.
  • Analytics and Reporting: Both provide detailed analytics and reporting functionalities to track performance and identify areas for improvement.
  • Integrations: They come with strong integration capabilities, allowing them to work seamlessly with other popular business tools.

Differences

While sharing several common features, Re:amaze and Jira Service Management also have distinct differences that cater to specific needs:

  • Primary Use Case:
  • Re:amaze: Focuses on customer support across multiple channels, ideal for e-commerce, SaaS, and service-based businesses.
  • Jira Service Management: Emphasizes collaboration between Dev and Ops teams, making it a robust choice for IT service management and internal request handling.
  • Knowledge Management:
  • Re:amaze: Offers FAQ Knowledge Bases directly within the platform.
  • Jira Service Management: Integrates with Confluence to create a comprehensive knowledge management system.
  • Incident and Change Management:
  • Re:amaze: Primarily focuses on customer support and lacks specialized incident and change management features.
  • Jira Service Management: Provides full-fledged incident and change management functionalities aligned with ITIL best practices.
  • Collaboration Features:
  • Re:amaze: Includes internal collaboration tools like private notes and team chats.
  • Jira Service Management: Offers deeper integration with other Atlassian products like Jira Software, Confluence, and Bitbucket to enhance team collaboration further.
  • Asset Management:
  • Re:amaze: Does not provide dedicated asset management features.
  • Jira Service Management: Includes asset and configuration management capabilities to track and manage IT assets and services.

Pros and Cons

Re:amaze

Pros:

  • Superior multi-channel support including VOIP and social media.
  • User-friendly interface suitable for customer service teams.
  • Comprehensive integration with ecommerce and CRM platforms.
  • Effective customizable chatbots for handling routine queries.

Cons:

  • Limited focus on internal IT and incident management.
  • Lacks deep integrations with DevOps tools.
  • May require third-party apps for advanced reporting features.

Jira Service Management

Pros:

  • In-depth incident, problem, and change management capabilities.
  • Strong integration with Atlassian ecosystem (Jira Software, Confluence, Bitbucket).
  • Robust asset and configuration management tools.
  • Customizable SLAs and workflows enforce service quality and efficiency.

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve, especially for non-IT users.
  • May feel over-engineered for small customer support teams.
  • Less emphasis on social media and VOIP support.

Use Cases

Re:amaze:

  • E-commerce Businesses: Ideal for online stores needing comprehensive customer support across chat, email, social media, and more.
  • SaaS Companies: Suitable for SaaS providers who want to offer exceptional support via multiple channels while integrating with CRM tools.
  • Service-Based Businesses: Useful for service-oriented businesses aiming to streamline communications and improve customer satisfaction.

Jira Service Management:

  • IT Service Management: Best for IT departments needing structured incident, problem, and change management workflows.
  • Development and Operations Teams: Valuable for organizations looking to improve DevOps collaboration and operational efficiency.
  • Large Enterprises: Effective for large enterprises with complex service management needs and a requirement for detailed asset tracking and management.

Conclusion

Choosing between Re:amaze and Jira Service Management ultimately depends on your specific needs and business goals. 

Re:amaze stands out as an excellent tool for customer-facing businesses that require multi-channel support and seamless integration with CRM and ecommerce platforms. It’s user-friendly and geared toward providing comprehensive customer engagement solutions.

Jira Service Management, meanwhile, is tailored for IT service management and DevOps. Its robust incident, change, and asset management capabilities make it a powerful choice for IT departments and large enterprises seeking to enhance operational agility and service delivery.

For businesses focusing on customer support across various channels, Re:amaze would be a suitable choice. Conversely, if your focus is on IT service management or if you’re working in a DevOps environment, Jira Service Management would likely provide the comprehensive features and integrations needed to support high-velocity teamwork and service excellence.

주요 결론 🔑🥡🍕

소규모 비즈니스에 더 적합한 티켓 도구는 무엇인가요? Re:amaze인가요, 아니면 Jira Service Management인가요?

기본 기능이 있는 사용자 친화적인 티켓 도구를 찾고 있는 소규모 비즈니스의 경우, Re:amaze가 더 나은 선택일 수 있습니다. 그의 단순함과 합리적인 가격은 기본 고객 서비스 요구가 있는 스타트업과 소규모 회사에 이상적입니다.

Re:amaze를 Jira Service Management와 차별화하는 티켓 기능의 주요 특징은 무엇인가요?

Re:amaze는 사용의 용이성, 여러 커뮤니케이션 채널과의 원활한 통합, 그리고 포괄적인 헬프 데스크 기능으로 뛰어납니다. 반면, Jira Service Management는 대규모 조직에 맞춰진 강력한 티켓 자동화, 고급 보고서 및 깊은 맞춤 설정 옵션을 제공합니다.

Re:amaze와 Jira Service Management의 가격 구조를 설명해 주실 수 있나요? 그리고 이들이 회사의 결정에 어떤 영향을 미칠 수 있는지요?

Re:amaze의 가격은 간단하며 사용자 수에 기반합니다. 이 단순성은 예산에 민감한 기업들에게 매력적일 수 있습니다. 반면에, Jira Service Management의 가격은 더 복잡하고, 계층별로 제공되는 계획이 확장성과 고급 기능을 제공하지만 소규모 회사에게는 비용이 부담될 수 있습니다.

Guru와 함께 모든 곳에서 정답을 얻으십시오.

Learn more tools and terminology re: workplace knowledge