Back to Reference
No items found.
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.
Watch a demoTake a product tour
June 6, 2024
XX min read

Lucca vs Lano


Choosing the right Human Resource Information System (HRIS) tool is crucial for optimizing and automating HR processes. Two robust options in this domain are Lucca and Lano, each offering unique functionalities to meet diverse needs.

Lucca provides a suite of HR software that turns spreadsheets into interactive online services, streamlining internal management processes. It helps organizations automate tasks, track employee metrics, and enhance overall HR efficiency.

Lano, on the other hand, is a cloud-based compliance and payments platform that provides a unified solution for hiring, managing, and paying employees and contractors across more than 150 countries. It ensures full compliance without the need to set up a legal entity in these regions.

This comparison will detail the differences, similarities, pros, cons, and unique features of these two tools to help you determine which might be the best fit for your HR needs.

Lucca Overview

Key Features

  • Employee Records Management: Lucca offers a digital system to maintain and update comprehensive employee records securely.
  • Leave and Absence Tracking: The software provides an intuitive platform for employees to request leave and for managers to track and approve absences.
  • Expense Management: Automate and streamline the process of expense reporting, approval, and reimbursement.
  • Performance Evaluation: Tools for setting goals, tracking performance, and conducting employee appraisals.
  • Onboarding: Simplifies the onboarding process for new hires, ensuring all necessary documentation and training are completed efficiently.
  • Time Tracking: Enables employees to log their working hours, aiding in payroll processing and project management.
  • Payroll Integration: Seamlessly integrates with payroll systems to ensure accurate and timely payments.

Lano Overview

Key Features

  • Global Compliance Management: Ensures compliance with local tax, labor laws, and regulations for hiring and managing international employees and contractors.
  • Employee and Contractor Payment: Facilitates seamless payments in multiple currencies, reducing administrative burden.
  • Hiring Across Borders: Lano's platform supports hiring employees in over 150 countries without needing local legal entities.
  • Contractor Management: Comprehensive tools for managing contracts, negotiating terms, and tracking deliverables for freelancers and contractors.
  • Unified Dashboard: A single interface to manage all aspects of employee and contractor management, including payroll, compliance, and reporting.
  • Time and Task Tracking: Tools to monitor employee and contractor work hours and productivity, aiding in performance assessments and project management.
  • Integrated Communication: Built-in communication tools for easy collaboration and information sharing.


Both Lucca and Lano excel as HRIS tools with capabilities that enhance HR processes and compliance. 

  • Employee Records Management: Both tools provide robust systems for maintaining detailed and secure employee records.
  • Onboarding: Each platform facilitates smooth onboarding processes, ensuring new hires have all they need from day one.
  • Time Tracking: Lucca and Lano offer solutions to log and manage employee working hours.
  • Compliance: Both ensure adherence to various employment laws and regulations, although Lano focuses more on global compliance.
  • Payroll Integration: Each tool can integrate with payroll systems to simplify the compensation process.


While Lucca and Lano share several functionalities, they differ significantly in their core focus and additional features:

  • Scope of Compliance: Lano offers extensive global compliance features, making it ideal for companies with a global workforce. Lucca's compliance capabilities are more region-specific.
  • Global Payments: Lano excels in facilitating payments in multiple currencies for employees and contractors worldwide, which is not a central feature of Lucca.
  • Expense Management: Lucca includes detailed expense management functionalities, whereas Lano does not explicitly focus on this aspect.
  • Performance Evaluation: Lucca provides tools for setting goals and conducting performance reviews, features that Lano lacks.
  • Unified HR Dashboard: Lano provides a comprehensive dashboard covering payroll, compliance, and contractor management, while Lucca's dashboard focuses more on internal HR processes.
  • Communication Tools: Lano offers built-in communication tools for better collaboration across teams and regions, a feature not heavily emphasized in Lucca.

Pros and Cons


  • Pros:
  • Comprehensive HR management features.
  • Strong focus on performance evaluation.
  • Effective leave and absence tracking.
  • Good integration with payroll systems.
  • User-friendly interface.
  • Cons:
  • Limited focus on global workforce management.
  • Expense management may not suit all needs.
  • Smaller scope of compliance compared to Lano.


  • Pros:
  • Excellent global compliance management.
  • Simplifies international hiring and payments.
  • Comprehensive contractor management.
  • Integrated communication and collaboration tools.
  • Unified HR dashboard for global workforce management.
  • Cons:
  • Less focus on internal HR processes like performance evaluations.
  • Limited expense management capabilities.
  • May be too complex for smaller, region-specific companies.

Use Cases


  • Regional Companies: Ideal for businesses focusing within a particular region needing robust internal HR management tools.
  • Performance-Driven Organizations: Suited for companies that prioritize employee performance tracking and goal setting.
  • SMEs: Helpful for small to medium-sized enterprises looking to streamline HR processes without extensive global needs.


  • Global Enterprises: Perfect for enterprises managing a global workforce, dealing with multiple currencies, and navigating diverse compliance requirements.
  • Contractor Heavy Businesses: Best for companies that rely heavily on freelancers and contractors and need support in managing these relationships.
  • Startups with Global Ambitions: Useful for startups planning rapid global expansions and needing to onboard international teams quickly and compliantly.


In comparing Lucca and Lano, both serve as efficient HRIS tools with different strengths tailored to specific needs. 

Lucca shines with its comprehensive HR management suite focusing on internal processes like performance evaluations, time tracking, and payroll integration, making it well-suited for SMEs and region-specific companies.

Lano excels in managing and paying a global workforce, ensuring compliance across multiple jurisdictions, and supporting seamless international hiring and contractor management, making it the go-to choice for enterprises with global operations and remote teams.

Choosing between Lucca and Lano ultimately depends on your company's specific requirements. If your focus is on detailed internal HR processes, performance tracking, and regional compliance, Lucca is a solid choice. Conversely, if you need robust solutions for global workforce management, hiring, and compliance, Lano would be the better fit. Consider your organization's scale, scope, and HR priorities to determine the best tool.

Key takeaways 🔑🥡🍕

Written by
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.

Learn more tools and terminology re: workplace knowledge