Back to Reference
No items found.
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.
Watch a demoTake a product tour
June 6, 2024
XX min read

Sesame vs Lano

Introduction

In today's fast-paced business world, managing human resources efficiently is crucial to organizational success. This is where HRIS tools like Sesame HR and Lano come into play. These platforms streamline and automate HR tasks, helping companies focus on improving employee experiences and maintaining compliance across borders.

Sesame HR allows companies to digitize routine HR processes, simplifying and automating them to save time and enhance employee experience. This makes it a valuable asset for managers and executives. On the other hand, Lano is a cloud-based compliance and payments platform designed to manage hiring, compliance, and payments for employees and contractors in over 150 countries, simplifying global workforce management without needing to set up a legal entity.

Comparing HRIS tools like Sesame HR and Lano is essential for businesses to find the best fit for their unique requirements. This detailed comparison will help you understand the similarities, differences, pros, and cons of each, aiding in making an informed decision.

Sesame HR Overview

Sesame HR stands out as a comprehensive tool designed to digitize and automate HR processes. Its goal is to simplify the routine tasks that consume valuable time from HR teams, allowing them to focus on strategic initiatives and improving employee experience.

Key Features

  • Employee Management: Centralizes employee data, making it accessible and easy to manage.
  • Time Tracking: Automates attendance and work hours, integrating seamlessly with payroll systems.
  • Leave Management: Simplifies the leave request and approval process with transparent and automated workflows.
  • Performance Reviews: Provides tools to plan, execute, and analyze performance reviews effectively.
  • Document Management: Organizes important HR documents in a central repository, ensuring easy access and security.
  • Reporting and Analytics: Generates reports and insights to help HR teams make data-driven decisions.
  • Mobile Access: Offers mobile applications to manage HR tasks on the go.

Lano Overview

Lano focuses on providing a unified platform for global workforce management. It offers comprehensive solutions for compliance, hiring, and payments, particularly valuable for companies operating across multiple countries.

Key Features

  • Global Hiring: Facilitates hiring employees and contractors in over 150 countries without needing a legal entity.
  • Compliance Management: Ensures all employment practices adhere to local laws and regulations.
  • Payroll Processing: Manages payroll for a global workforce, converting payments into local currencies.
  • Contract Management: Creates, manages, and stores employment contracts in compliance with local regulations.
  • Expense Management: Simplifies the process of reimbursing employees and managing expenses.
  • Time Tracking: Tracks hours worked and integrates with payroll systems for accurate compensation.
  • Employee Benefits: Offers solutions for global employee benefits management.

Similarities

Both Sesame HR and Lano are robust HRIS tools designed to streamline HR processes and enhance efficiency. Here are some common features:

  • Employee Data Management: Centralize employee information for easy access and management.
  • Time Tracking: Automated tracking of working hours and attendance.
  • Performance Management: Tools for conducting and managing employee assessments.
  • Mobile Accessibility: Both platforms offer mobile solutions, enabling HR tasks on the go.
  • Document Management: Centralized storage and organization of important HR documents.

Differences

Despite their similarities, Sesame HR and Lano have distinct differences that cater to different business needs.

  • Core Functionality:
  • Sesame HR focuses on digitizing and automating routine HR processes to improve internal efficiencies.
  • Lano specializes in global workforce management, ensuring compliance, and managing payroll across different countries.
  • Target Audience:
  • Sesame HR is well-suited for companies looking to streamline internal HR processes.
  • Lano is ideal for businesses with a global presence needing to manage international employees and contractors.
  • Compliance:
  • Lano provides extensive compliance management features tailored for international operations.
  • Payment Processing:
  • Lano includes robust payroll and payment processing capabilities tailored for global workforces.
  • Geographical Focus:
  • Sesame HR primarily focuses on automating domestic HR processes.
  • Lano is designed for companies operating across multiple countries.

Pros and Cons

Sesame HR

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface that simplifies HR tasks.
  • Strong focus on automating routine HR processes.
  • Excellent time and leave management features.
  • Centralized document management.
  • Mobile access for on-the-go management.

Cons:

  • Limited global compliance features.
  • Less emphasis on payroll processing, especially for international payments.
  • May lack specialized features for managing a global workforce.

Lano

Pros:

  • Comprehensive global compliance capabilities.
  • Facilitates international hiring without setting up legal entities.
  • Robust payroll processing for multiple countries.
  • Integrated contract and expense management.
  • Strong solution for managing benefits globally.

Cons:

  • Can be overly complex for businesses operating solely in one country.
  • Higher learning curve due to the breadth of features for global management.
  • Potentially higher costs due to extensive international capabilities.

Use Cases

Sesame HR

  • Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Businesses looking to streamline and automate their HR processes without needing extensive global management capabilities.
  • Domestic Focus: Companies operating primarily within one country, focusing on improving internal efficiencies.
  • HR Teams Seeking Efficiency: Ideal for HR teams looking to automate routine tasks and focus on strategic HR initiatives.

Lano

  • Global Enterprises: Organizations with employees and contractors in multiple countries needing to manage compliance and payments internationally.
  • Startups Expanding Globally: Startups looking to hire talent globally without establishing legal entities in each country.
  • Firms with Complex Payroll Needs: Companies requiring comprehensive payroll solutions for a diverse, international workforce.

Conclusion

When comparing Sesame HR and Lano, it's clear that both tools offer valuable functionalities tailored to different business needs. Sesame HR excels in automating and simplifying internal HR processes, making it an excellent choice for companies looking to enhance operational efficiency within a domestic setting. Its user-friendly interface and specific focus on routine HR tasks make it a strong contender for SMEs and HR teams aiming to streamline their workload.

On the other hand, Lano stands out with its robust global compliance and payroll processing capabilities, making it ideal for businesses managing an international workforce. Lano's ability to handle complex global hiring, compliance, and payment processes provides substantial value to enterprises operating across multiple countries and startups planning global expansion.

Ultimately, selecting between Sesame HR and Lano depends on your organization's specific needs. If your primary goal is to improve internal HR efficiencies without extensive international operations, Sesame HR is likely the better fit. However, if managing a global workforce and ensuring compliance across numerous countries are your main concerns, Lano offers the comprehensive features required to meet those challenges effectively.

Key takeaways 🔑🥡🍕

Written by
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.

Learn more tools and terminology re: workplace knowledge