Back to Reference
No items found.
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.
Watch a demoTake a product tour
June 6, 2024
XX min read

Breathe vs Lano


In the realm of Human Resources Information Systems (HRIS) tools, Breathe and Lano stand out for their unique offerings tailored to different organizational needs. 

Breathe is a multi-award-winning simple and secure people software designed to help UK and Australian SMEs streamline their core people processes online. By moving these processes online, Breathe aims to save time, provide peace of mind, and enable businesses to operate effectively regardless of their location.

Lano, on the other hand, is a comprehensive cloud-based compliance and payments platform. It offers a unified solution for hiring, managing, and paying employees and contractors across over 150 countries worldwide, without the need to establish a legal entity.

Comparing HRIS tools like Breathe and Lano is crucial for businesses to identify the best fit according to their specific needs, ensuring operational efficiency and compliance.

Breathe Overview

Key Features

Breathe offers a range of features designed to simplify HR processes for SMEs:

  • Employee Records: Centralizes employee data, allowing easy access and updates.
  • HR Reporting: Generates comprehensive HR reports to aid in decision-making.
  • Absence Management: Tracks and manages employee absences efficiently.
  • Performance Management: Facilitates appraisals and performance reviews.
  • Employee Self-Service: Enables employees to manage their profiles and access information independently.
  • Document Management: Securely stores and manages HR documents.
  • Training Management: Tracks and schedules employee training sessions.
  • Recruitment Management: Simplifies the recruitment process with streamlined workflows.
  • Compliance: Ensures compliance with UK and Australian employment laws.

Lano Overview

Key Features

Lano provides an extensive suite of features to manage global HR processes seamlessly:

  • Global Hiring: Facilitates hiring and onboarding in over 150 countries.
  • Compliance Management: Ensures full compliance with local employment laws.
  • Payroll Management: Provides solutions for international payroll and payments.
  • Contractor Management: Manages contracts and payments for freelance workers.
  • Time Tracking: Tracks working hours and project progress.
  • Expense Management: Simplifies the process of recording and reimbursing expenses.
  • Document Storage: Centralizes documentation for easy access and compliance.
  • Employee Self-Service: Allows employees to manage their information and communicate needs.
  • HR Analytics: Offers data-driven insights for better decision-making.


Breathe and Lano share several similarities as HRIS tools, making them both valuable for HR management:

  • Employee Self-Service: Both platforms enable employees to manage their profiles and access relevant information.
  • Document Management: Each tool offers secure document storage and management features.
  • Compliance: Both Breathe and Lano prioritize compliance with local labor laws.
  • HR Analytics: They provide HR analytics and reporting capabilities to aid in decision-making.
  • Time and Expense Tracking: Each platform offers functionalities that streamline time tracking and expense reimbursement.


While Breathe and Lano share several similarities, they also have distinct differences that set them apart:

  • Geographic Focus: Breathe is primarily focused on SMEs in the UK and Australia, whereas Lano operates on a global scale, supporting HR processes in over 150 countries.
  • Core Functionality: Breathe excels in managing traditional HR tasks such as performance management, training, and recruitment. Lano, however, stands out in global hiring, payroll management, and contractor management.
  • Compliance Scope: Breathe concentrates on UK and Australian employment laws, while Lano ensures compliance across diverse jurisdictions worldwide.
  • Target Audience: Breathe targets small to medium-sized businesses, while Lano caters to both SMEs and large enterprises looking to manage global workforces.
  • Payment Solutions: Lano provides comprehensive payroll and payment solutions for international employees and contractors, a feature not extensively covered by Breathe.

Pros and Cons



  • User-friendly interface suitable for small and medium-sized businesses.
  • Comprehensive set of features for traditional HR management.
  • Strong focus on compliance with UK and Australian labor laws.
  • Multi-award-winning platform recognized for its reliability.
  • Cost-effective solution for SMEs.


  • Limited focus on global HR needs and compliance.
  • May not be suitable for large corporations or those with a dispersed global workforce.
  • Lacks extensive payroll management features compared to Lano.



  • Robust platform for global HR management and compliance.
  • Extensive payroll and payment solutions for international employees and contractors.
  • Comprehensive features for hiring, managing, and paying across 150+ countries.
  • Strong focus on compliance with diverse labor laws worldwide.
  • Scalable solution suitable for both SMEs and large enterprises.


  • May be more complex for small businesses with local operations.
  • Higher cost potentially compared to Breathe, making it less ideal for small budgets.
  • Requires onboarding and training to fully leverage its extensive features.

Use Cases


Ideal Scenarios

  • UK and Australian SMEs: Perfect for small to mid-sized businesses within these regions needing to streamline HR processes.
  • Traditional HR Management: Companies needing solid support in performance management, training, recruitment, and employee records.
  • Compliance: Businesses that need to ensure adherence to UK and Australian employment laws.
  • Simplified HR Processes: Organizations seeking a user-friendly platform to manage their HR operations effectively.


Ideal Scenarios

  • Global Businesses: Enterprises with operations in multiple countries needing to manage HR compliance and payroll internationally.
  • Remote and Freelance Workforces: Companies with a large number of remote workers or contractors needing a robust system for contracts and payments.
  • Scalability: Organizations looking for a platform that can grow and adapt as they expand into new markets.
  • Comprehensive Payroll Solutions: Businesses requiring an extensive payroll and payments management system for a diverse workforce.


In comparing Breathe and Lano as HRIS tools, several critical observations emerge:

  • Breathe is a robust, user-friendly solution ideal for SMEs in the UK and Australia. It offers a comprehensive suite of traditional HR management features, making it perfect for companies seeking to streamline their HR processes locally. Its strong compliance focus on UK and Australian labor laws ensures businesses can operate confidently within these regions.

  • Lano stands out for its ability to manage global HR processes with ease. It caters to businesses with international workforces, providing extensive solutions for hiring, paying, and maintaining compliance across more than 150 countries. Lano is particularly useful for organizations needing sophisticated payroll and payment systems and those with a large number of remote or freelance workers.


For small to mid-sized businesses operating primarily within the UK and Australia, Breathe offers a straightforward, effective solution for managing traditional HR tasks. However, for companies with a global presence or those anticipating international expansion, Lano provides the scalability and compliance management necessary to navigate the complexities of a dispersed workforce. Selecting between these two tools should hinge on the geographic scope of your business operations and the specific HR functionalities most critical to your organization’s success.

Key takeaways 🔑🥡🍕

Written by
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.

Learn more tools and terminology re: workplace knowledge