Back to Reference
No items found.
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.
Watch a demoTake a product tour
June 6, 2024
XX min read

Shortcut vs Gitlab


Choosing the right project management tool is critical for any team looking to improve efficiency and workflow. Shortcut and GitLab are two noteworthy options catering to different aspects of project management, development, and collaboration.

Shortcut unites planning and development in a single experience with tightly integrated Docs, Issue Tracking, Sprint Planning, Objectives, and Roadmap features. It aims to provide a seamless connection between planning and execution, making it easier for teams to stay aligned and productive.

GitLab is an AI-powered DevSecOps platform that enables software innovation by empowering development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. GitLab helps teams create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously, integrating and optimizing every stage of the DevSecOps lifecycle.

In this comparison, we will analyze both tools in-depth to help you determine which one might be the best fit for your team's needs.

Shortcut Overview

Shortcut brings together various elements essential for planning and executing projects in a unified environment, focusing on development and sprint management.

Key Features

  • Docs Integration: A built-in document system to maintain all team knowledge in one place.
  • Issue Tracking: Robust issue tracking capabilities to log, manage, and resolve issues efficiently.
  • Sprint Planning: Advanced sprint planning tools to help teams manage their work cycles effectively.
  • Objectives and Key Results (OKRs): Alignment of team efforts with company objectives through integrated OKRs.
  • Roadmaps: Visual and interactive roadmaps to track project progress and future goals.

GitLab Overview

GitLab offers a comprehensive suite of tools for software development, security, and operations, built to support the entire DevSecOps lifecycle seamlessly.

Key Features

  • Version Control: Advanced Git-based version control to manage code repositories.
  • CI/CD: Built-in Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment tools for automated testing and deployment.
  • Security: A suite of security features integrated into the development lifecycle.
  • Project Management: Kanban boards, issue tracking, and milestone tracking to streamline project management.
  • Collaboration: Collaborative features like merge requests and code reviews to enhance team communication and code quality.


Both Shortcut and GitLab offer comprehensive tools for project management, including:

  • Issue Tracking: Both platforms feature robust issue tracking systems to log and manage tasks and bugs.
  • Roadmapping: Both offer tools to create and visualize roadmaps, making it easier to plan and track project progress.
  • Sprint Planning: Each tool provides functionalities to manage and plan sprints effectively.
  • Collaboration: Collaboration tools to enhance teamwork, including integrated documentation and communication features.


While there are many similarities, several key differences set Shortcut and GitLab apart:

  • Primary Focus: Shortcut focuses on integrating planning and development, providing features like Docs, Sprint Planning, and Roadmaps. GitLab, on the other hand, is centered around the entire DevSecOps lifecycle, emphasizing CI/CD, security, and version control.
  • Integrated Security: GitLab offers comprehensive security features tailored for the DevSecOps workflow, which Shortcut does not.
  • Version Control: GitLab’s Git-based version control system is significantly more advanced compared to Shortcut’s offerings.
  • AI Integration: GitLab’s AI-powered capabilities for optimizing development processes are a unique feature, whereas Shortcut does not currently emphasize AI in its toolkit.

Pros and Cons



  • Integrated Docs for centralizing team knowledge.
  • Robust issue tracking and sprint planning tools.
  • Comprehensive roadmap functionalities.
  • OKRs integration for aligning team efforts with company goals.
  • User-friendly interface conducive to agile workflows.


  • Limited in security features compared to GitLab.
  • Not as robust in CI/CD capabilities.
  • Lack of advanced Git-based version control.




  • Comprehensive suite covering the entire DevSecOps lifecycle.
  • Advanced CI/CD tools facilitating automated testing and deployment.
  • Integrated security features enhancing code safety.
  • Robust version control system with extensive collaborative tools.
  • AI-powered capabilities improving development efficiency.


  • Can be overwhelming for teams not deeply embedded in DevSecOps.
  • Steeper learning curve for non-technical users.
  • Higher complexity might require more onboarding time and resources.

Use Cases


Shortcut is ideal for teams that:

  • Look for a unified platform to align planning with development.
  • Need robust sprint planning and issue tracking tools.
  • Value seamless document integration for maintaining team knowledge.
  • Require clear and interactive roadmaps for project tracking.
  • Aim to align team efforts with company objectives through OKRs.


GitLab suits teams that:

  • Require an all-encompassing DevSecOps platform.
  • Need powerful CI/CD tools for automated testing and continuous deployment.
  • Prioritize integrated security throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Work heavily with Git-based version control systems.
  • Benefit from AI-powered tools to enhance the development process.


In sum, both Shortcut and GitLab offer robust project management tools, but they cater to different aspects of the development lifecycle. Shortcut excels in planning and development alignment, making it ideal for teams focused on agile workflows and sprint management. Conversely, GitLab provides a comprehensive suite for the entire DevSecOps lifecycle, emphasizing security, CI/CD, and version control.

For teams looking for a unified solution that integrates planning with development in a user-friendly interface, Shortcut is a solid choice. However, for teams requiring advanced CI/CD, integrated security features, and a comprehensive DevSecOps platform with AI capabilities, GitLab would be the better fit. Understanding your team's specific needs and workflow will be key to making the best choice between these two powerful tools.

Key takeaways 🔑🥡🍕

Written by
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.

Learn more tools and terminology re: workplace knowledge