Back to Reference
No items found.
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.
Watch a demoTake a product tour
June 6, 2024
XX min read

Trello vs Gitlab


When selecting the right project management tools for your organization, it's essential to understand the scope and functionality of available options. Trello and GitLab are two distinct yet popular choices that cater to different user needs and project requirements.

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into cards and boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on it, and where something is in the process. It is highly visual and easy to use, making it a favorite among teams that need a simple and intuitive way to manage tasks and projects.

Gitlab is the most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform that enables software innovation by empowering development, security, and operations teams to build better software faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. It helps your teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software.

Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of these tools can help you determine which one is best suited for your specific project management needs.

Trello Overview

Trello is designed to be straightforward and user-friendly, making it a popular choice for teams looking for an easy way to organize projects and tasks visually.

Key Features

  • Boards and Cards: Trello's primary units of organization are boards, lists, and cards. Boards represent the overall project, lists are stages of the project, and cards are individual tasks.
  • Drag-and-Drop Interface: The drag-and-drop functionality allows users to move cards between lists easily, reflecting the progress of tasks.
  • Integrations: Trello integrates with numerous third-party applications such as Slack, Google Drive, and Evernote, making it adaptable to various workflows.
  • Checklists and Due Dates: Users can add checklists, due dates, and attachments to cards, enhancing task management capabilities without overwhelming complexity.
  • Collaboration Tools: Trello supports comments, file attachments, and mentions, allowing team members to communicate efficiently within the platform.
  • Automation (Butler): Trello offers an in-built automation tool named Butler that helps automate repetitive tasks and workflows based on custom rules.

GitLab Overview

GitLab stands out as a comprehensive, end-to-end tool aimed at development, security, and operations (DevSecOps) teams requiring robust tools for software project management and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD).

Key Features

  • Repository Management: GitLab provides powerful Git repository management tools including branching, merging, and collaboration features.
  • Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): Fully integrated CI/CD pipelines allow for continuous integration, delivery, and deployment, ensuring faster and more reliable software releases.
  • Security and Compliance: GitLab offers comprehensive security testing tools, vulnerability management, and compliance features, ensuring code and applications stay secure.
  • Issue Tracking and Project Management: Users can create, manage, and track issues with advanced features such as milestones, labels, and time tracking.
  • Review and Collaboration: Merge requests facilitate code review and collaboration, helping maintain code quality and team collaboration.
  • Wikis and Snippets: GitLab includes built-in wikis for documentation and snippets for sharing code and configurations, enhancing collective knowledge across teams.


While Trello and GitLab serve different primary user bases, they do share some common functionalities expected from project management tools:

  • Task Management: Both Trello and GitLab provide robust task management features, enabling users to create, assign, and track tasks effectively.
  • Collaboration: Both tools support team collaboration, allowing multiple users to work together, comment on tasks/issues, and share files or information in real-time.
  • Integration Capabilities: They both offer extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, enhancing their usability and flexibility within different workflows.
  • Customizability: Trello and GitLab allow for a high degree of customization through templates, automation rules, and personalized configurations to fit specific project requirements.


Despite their commonalities, Trello and GitLab have distinct differences shaped by their core functionality and target users:

  • Primary Focus: Trello is a general-purpose project management tool ideal for visual task management across various industries. GitLab, on the other hand, is tailored to DevSecOps, providing end-to-end lifecycle management for software projects.
  • User Interface: Trello's user interface is highly visual and intuitive, using a kanban-style board for task management. GitLab's interface is more complex, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities including repository management, CI/CD pipelines, and advanced security features.
  • Complexity and Learning Curve: Trello's simplicity makes it easy to get started but may lack advanced features for more complex project needs. GitLab, while offering a rich set of features for development teams, has a steeper learning curve.
  • Automation: Trello uses Butler for simple automation of tasks and workflows, whereas GitLab offers advanced automation capabilities through CI/CD pipelines, making it more suitable for continuous software development and deployment.
  • Documentation and Knowledge Sharing: GitLab includes built-in wikis and code snippets specifically for documentation and code sharing, supporting the needs of development teams. Trello’s card-based comments and attachments provide basic documentation features suitable for various project types.

Pros and Cons



  • Ease of Use: Simple, intuitive interface with a quick learning curve.
  • Visual Task Management: The board and card system provides an easy-to-understand visual representation of projects.
  • Flexibility: Suitable for various industries and types of projects.
  • Integration Capabilities: Supports numerous third-party integrations to extend functionality.
  • Cost-Effective: Offers a free version with enough features for small teams and projects.


  • Limited Advanced Features: Lacks deep functionality needed for complex project management.
  • Scalability: May not scale well with increasing project complexity or team size.
  • Dependency on Integrations: Relies heavily on integrations for advanced features, which can complicate workflows.
  • Limited Reporting: Basic reporting capabilities may not meet the needs of data-driven teams.



  • Comprehensive DevSecOps Tool: Offers a full suite of tools for managing the entire software development lifecycle.
  • Advanced CI/CD: Integrates powerful CI/CD pipelines for continuous integration and delivery.
  • Security Features: Built-in security testing and vulnerability management.
  • Documentation: In-built wikis and snippets provide solid documentation and knowledge-sharing tools.
  • Scalability: Capable of handling large and complex projects and teams.


  • Steep Learning Curve: Extensive features may be overwhelming for new users.
  • Complex Interface: More complex than other project management tools, requiring time to master.
  • Cost: Higher cost for comprehensive features, especially for small teams or businesses.
  • Development Focused: Primarily geared towards software development teams, limiting usefulness for other industries.

Use Cases


  • Small to Mid-Sized Projects: Ideal for teams needing a simple, visual way to organize tasks and projects.
  • Content and Marketing Teams: Great for brainstorming, content calendars, and marketing campaigns due to its flexible, visual nature.
  • Remote Teams: Excellent for remote teams needing a straightforward collaboration tool to stay aligned.
  • Kanban Methodology: Perfect for teams using Kanban for project management, providing a clear representation of tasks and progress.


  • Software Development Teams: Best suited for teams involved in software development, offering an all-in-one tool for coding, CI/CD, and deployment.
  • DevSecOps Initiatives: Ideal for organizations adopting DevSecOps practices, integrating development, security, and operations seamlessly.
  • Large, Complex Projects: Suitable for large-scale projects requiring robust management, security, and CI/CD capabilities.
  • Continuous Deployment: Perfect for teams needing continuous deployment and integration, ensuring faster, more reliable releases.


Choosing between Trello and GitLab depends significantly on your specific needs and project requirements. 

Trello's user-friendly, visual task management system makes it suitable for a wide range of industries and smaller projects thanks to its simplicity and extensive integration options. It provides an excellent platform for teams that need a straightforward, visual way to track and manage tasks without requiring deep technical expertise.

GitLab, however, is a comprehensive tool tailored for software development teams that need robust features to manage the complete DevSecOps lifecycle. Its advanced CI/CD capabilities and built-in security features make it the ideal choice for teams focusing on continuous integration, continuous deployment, and maintaining high software quality.

In summary, if your focus is on visual task management and simplicity, Trello might be the best fit for your team. However, if you need an all-encompassing tool with advanced capabilities for software development and deployment, GitLab’s comprehensive feature set would better meet your needs.

Key takeaways 🔑🥡🍕

Written by
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.

Learn more tools and terminology re: workplace knowledge