Back to Reference
No items found.
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.
Watch a demoTake a product tour
June 6, 2024
XX min read

Wrike vs Linear


In the realm of project management tools, choosing the right software can significantly impact team productivity, collaboration, and project success. Wrike and Linear are two prominent tools in this category, each offering unique features tailored to different types of teams and workflows.

Wrike is an all-in-one project management software that helps remote and co-located teams get more things done together. It integrates various project management functions, enabling seamless collaboration across different locations.

On the other hand, Linear is the project and issue tracking system that teams actually love to use. Linear helps thousands of high-impact product teams streamline issues, sprints, and product roadmaps, making it particularly popular among software development and product management teams.

Comparing these tools can help users determine which one best fits their unique needs, based on their team structure, project requirements, and preferred workflows.

Wrike Overview

Key Features

  • Task Management: Create, assign, and manage tasks with ease. Wrike’s task management includes subtasks, dependencies, and milestones, providing comprehensive project planning capabilities.
  • Collaborative Tools: Real-time collaboration features such as document sharing, comments, and live editing enhance team communication and coordination.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Tailor dashboards to view tasks, deadlines, and project progress. Custom widgets and Gantt charts offer visual project tracking.
  • Time Tracking: Built-in time tracking and timesheets to monitor how much time team members spend on tasks, helping in efficient resource planning.
  • Project Templates: Pre-built templates for various project types save time in setting up new projects and ensure consistent processes across the organization.
  • Integrations: Extensive integrations with tools like Slack, Salesforce, Adobe Creative Cloud, and more, ensuring Wrike fits well within existing tech stacks.
  • Mobile App: Stay connected with mobile apps for both iOS and Android, allowing project management on the go.
  • Reporting and Analytics: Advanced reporting features provide insights into project performance, enabling data-driven decisions.

Linear Overview

Key Features

  • Issue Tracking: Efficient issue tracking system allowing teams to log, track, and resolve issues quickly. Linear’s intuitive interface makes managing tasks uncomplicated.
  • Sprints and Cycles: Supports sprint planning and tracking, making it easy for development teams to manage their sprint cycles and maintain agility.
  • Product Roadmaps: Visualize product roadmaps to align team goals with business objectives. Linear's roadmaps offer a clear overview of ongoing and future work.
  • High-Performance Design: Linear is designed for speed, with a responsive interface that reduces lag and improves workflow efficiency.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts: Extensive use of keyboard shortcuts for quick navigation and task management, which can save time and improve productivity.
  • Integrations: Offers integrations with tools like GitHub, Slack, and Jira, enabling seamless workflows across different platforms.
  • Branch and Release Management: Manage branches and releases directly from Linear, facilitating continuous integration and deployment processes.
  • Mobile Support: Access Linear on the go with robust mobile applications for iOS and Android.


Wrike and Linear, as project management tools, share several similarities aimed at enhancing team productivity and collaboration:

  • Task Management: Both tools offer robust task management features, allowing users to create, assign, and track tasks efficiently.
  • Collaboration: Real-time collaboration is a core feature in both Wrike and Linear, with functionalities such as comments, attachments, and notifications.
  • Integrations: Both platforms support integrations with popular third-party tools, making it easier to synchronize workflows and data.
  • Mobile Access: Each offers mobile applications that enable users to manage projects and tasks on the go, providing flexibility and accessibility.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Both Wrike and Linear prioritize a user-friendly interface, ensuring that team members can navigate the platform with minimal training.


While Wrike and Linear share common features, there are distinct differences that cater to their respective user bases:

  • Focus Areas: Wrike is a comprehensive project management tool suitable for various industries, providing a wide range of features from task management to advanced reporting. Linear, conversely, is tailored more towards software development and product management, focusing on issue tracking and sprint management.
  • Complexity and Depth: Wrike offers a more extensive suite of features, including highly customizable dashboards, detailed time tracking, advanced reporting, and enterprise-level functionalities. Linear is designed for simplicity and speed, with a focus on reducing complexity in project and issue management.
  • User Experience: Wrike’s user experience may involve a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive capabilities. Linear’s interface is highly intuitive and designed for speed, often favored by teams looking for quick and efficient task handling.
  • Pricing Model: Wrike typically offers tiered pricing plans based on features and team size, which can be more expensive depending on the required functionalities. Linear’s pricing is more straightforward, often appealing to startups and smaller teams with a focus on software development.
  • Customization: Wrike provides extensive customization options for workflows, dashboards, and templates, making it adaptable to various project management needs. Linear emphasizes streamlined, pre-configured workflows aimed at reducing configuration time and effort.

Pros and Cons



  • Robust and comprehensive suite of project management features.
  • Highly customizable dashboards and workflows.
  • Advanced reporting and analytics for data-driven insights.
  • Extensive integrations with other software tools.
  • Scalable, suitable for growing businesses and large enterprises.
  • Excellent mobile applications for managing tasks on the go.


  • Steeper learning curve due to the abundance of features.
  • Can be more expensive, especially for smaller teams or startups.
  • Overwhelming for users seeking simplicity and speed.



  • Intuitive and user-friendly interface designed for speed.
  • Ideal for software development with features for issue tracking, sprints, and roadmaps.
  • Extensive use of keyboard shortcuts enhances productivity.
  • Quick setup and easy to integrate into existing workflows.
  • Straightforward pricing model.
  • Lightweight and high-performing design.


  • Limited advanced features compared to Wrike.
  • Primarily focused on software development teams, less versatile for other industries.
  • Customization options are more limited.
  • Reporting and analytics are not as extensive as Wrike’s offerings.

Use Cases


  • Ideal for medium to large enterprises needing comprehensive project management across various departments.
  • Highly suitable for teams requiring detailed task management, collaboration, and reporting features.
  • Excellent for organizations looking for extensive customization and scalability in their project management tools.
  • Useful in industries such as marketing, professional services, and operations where advanced project tracking and client management are critical.


  • Perfect for software development and product management teams focused on issue tracking and sprint planning.
  • Ideal for startups and smaller teams looking for a lightweight, high-speed project management tool.
  • Suitable for tech companies needing integration with development tools like GitHub and Jira.
  • Best for teams that prioritize quick task management and simplicity over a broad range of advanced features.


In comparing Wrike vs Linear, it is clear that both tools offer valuable features tailored to different types of users and project management needs. Wrike stands out with its comprehensive feature set, advanced customization options, and scalability, making it well-suited for larger enterprises and diverse industry applications. However, it comes with a steeper learning curve and higher cost.

Linear excels in simplicity, speed, and user experience, particularly for software development and product management teams. Its focus on issue tracking, sprints, and intuitive design makes it a favorite among tech companies and startups looking for an efficient, no-frills project management solution.

If your organization requires a robust, all-encompassing project management tool with extensive customization and reporting capabilities, Wrike is likely the better choice. Conversely, if you need a straightforward, high-speed tool for managing software development projects and product roadmaps, Linear may be the ideal solution. Understanding your team's specific needs, workflow preferences, and industry requirements will guide you toward making the best decision between these two powerful project management tools.

Key takeaways 🔑🥡🍕

Written by
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.

Learn more tools and terminology re: workplace knowledge