Back to Reference
No items found.
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.
Watch a demoTake a product tour
June 6, 2024
XX min read

Workday vs Lano

Introduction

When it comes to choosing a Human Resource Information System (HRIS) tool, two prominent options often come up: Workday and Lano. Both platforms offer robust capabilities tailored to different aspects of HR management.

Workday is renowned as a comprehensive finance system designed to drive business strategy and growth while mitigating risk. It allows businesses to efficiently manage financial processes with automated solutions, enabling actionable insights and reducing the focus on transaction processing.

Lano, on the other hand, provides a cloud-based compliance and payments platform aimed at streamlining the complexities of hiring, managing, and paying employees and contractors across over 150 countries. With its unified solution, Lano ensures organizations can operate in full compliance without the need to set up legal entities in different regions.

Comparing HRIS tools like Workday and Lano is essential for businesses to find the best fit for their unique needs. This comparison aims to provide an in-depth analysis of both platforms, highlighting their similarities, differences, pros, cons, and unique features.

Workday Overview

Workday offers a robust, integrated system for managing financial and human resources processes. It's designed for organizations looking to streamline operations, enhance decision-making, and minimize risks.

Key Features

  • Financial Management: Workday stands out for its advanced financial management capabilities, including real-time analytics, budgeting, forecasting, and financial reporting.
  • Human Capital Management (HCM): This feature enables organizations to manage the entire employee lifecycle, from recruiting and onboarding to performance management and payroll.
  • Analytics and Insights: Workday offers powerful analytics tools that provide real-time insights and data visualizations to help organizations make informed decisions quickly.
  • Adaptive Planning: This function helps in planning and modeling for finances, workforce, sales, and operations, ensuring that organizations can adapt to changing business environments.
  • Talent Management: Workday's talent management tools help attract, develop, and retain top talent, offering features like succession planning, career development, and learning management.
  • Cloud Platform: Workday operates entirely in the cloud, ensuring seamless updates and scalability without the need for significant IT resources.

Lano Overview

Lano simplifies the complexities of global HR operations with a focus on compliance and streamlined payment processes. It's ideal for companies looking to expand their workforce internationally without the burden of establishing legal entities.

Key Features

  • Global Hiring: Lano allows companies to hire employees and contractors in over 150 countries, ensuring compliance with local labor laws and regulations.
  • Payroll Solutions: The platform offers global payroll services, making it easier to manage payments in multiple currencies and adhering to international payroll regulations.
  • Compliance Management: Lano handles the complexity of compliance across various jurisdictions, mitigating risks related to employment law and taxation.
  • Contractor Management: Organizations can efficiently manage contracts and payments for freelancers and contractors, ensuring timely and compliant payments.
  • Expense Management: Lano provides tools for tracking employee expenses, ensuring that reimbursements are processed accurately and in compliance with local laws.
  • Integrated Platform: By integrating various HR functions into a single platform, Lano provides a seamless experience for managing a global workforce.

Similarities

Workday and Lano share several similarities as HRIS tools that can benefit organizations of all sizes:

  • Cloud-Based Solutions: Both platforms operate entirely in the cloud, ensuring accessibility, scalability, and regular updates without the need for extensive IT infrastructure.
  • Compliance Management: While their focuses differ, both Workday and Lano offer features that help organizations manage compliance, reducing risks related to labor laws and financial regulations.
  • Employee Lifecycle Management: Each platform provides tools to manage various stages of the employee lifecycle, from hiring to payroll and performance management.
  • Global Reach: Workday and Lano support international operations, though Lano specifically emphasizes managing global compliance and payments.

Differences

Despite their similarities, Workday and Lano have distinct differences that set them apart:

  • Core Functionality: Workday offers a comprehensive suite that includes advanced financial management and analytics, making it suitable for organizations seeking robust financial insights along with HR capabilities. Lano focuses more on global HR operations, especially related to compliance and payments.
  • Target Audience: Workday is often favored by larger enterprises needing extensive financial and HRM capabilities, whereas Lano is ideal for businesses looking to manage a global workforce without establishing international entities.
  • HR Focus: Workday's HR features are integrated into a broader enterprise management system, offering a holistic solution. Lano centers its offerings on simplifying international hiring, payroll, and compliance, making it more specialized.
  • Localization and Compliance: Lano provides extensive support for managing compliance across different countries, making it highly beneficial for companies with a global presence. Workday, while also offering compliance features, provides a more generalized approach suited to diverse business needs.

Pros and Cons

Workday

Pros:

  • Comprehensive financial and HR management capabilities.
  • Robust analytics and real-time data insights.
  • Integrated cloud platform offering regular updates and scalability.
  • Strong support for talent and performance management.
  • Extensive customization and configurability options.

Cons:

  • Can be cost-prohibitive for small to mid-sized businesses.
  • Complexity may require a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Implementation can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Lano

Pros:

  • Simplifies international hiring and compliance.
  • Streamlined payment and payroll solutions for global operations.
  • Supports managing contractors and freelancers with ease.
  • Reduces the need for setting up legal entities in different countries.
  • User-friendly interface with a focused approach on compliance.

Cons:

  • Limited financial management features compared to Workday.
  • May not offer the same depth in HR analytics and talent management.
  • Targeted mainly at companies with international operations.

Use Cases

Ideal scenarios or use cases for Workday as an HRIS tool:

  • Large enterprises seeking a unified platform for financial and HR management.
  • Organizations needing robust analytics and real-time insights to drive business decisions.
  • Companies with complex talent management requirements, including succession planning and learning management.
  • Businesses looking for a scalable solution that can grow with their operational needs.

Ideal scenarios or use cases for Lano as an HRIS tool:

  • Companies seeking to hire, manage, and pay employees or contractors globally without setting up legal entities.
  • Businesses needing a streamlined approach to ensure compliance with various international labor laws and payroll regulations.
  • Organizations that primarily require simplified contractor management and expense tracking.
  • Companies looking to expand their global workforce quickly and efficiently.

Conclusion

When comparing Workday and Lano as HRIS tools, it's clear that each platform has distinct strengths tailored to different business needs. Workday is an enterprise-grade solution offering comprehensive financial and HR management capabilities, ideal for large organizations needing robust analytics and extensive configurability. Lano, on the other hand, excels in simplifying global HR operations, focusing on compliance, payments, and contractor management, making it perfect for companies expanding their international workforce.

Choosing between Workday and Lano ultimately depends on your organization's size, complexity, and specific HR management needs. If your business requires an integrated platform for both financial and HR processes with advanced analytics, Workday is a strong contender. However, if your primary goal is to manage a global workforce efficiently with a focus on compliance and payroll, Lano offers a specialized and user-friendly solution.

Key takeaways 🔑🥡🍕

Written by
Search everything, get answers anywhere with Guru.

Learn more tools and terminology re: workplace knowledge